Political Science

(1 )Gay RightsIt is classical to distinguish fairylike rightlys from the issue of gay conjugal matrimony . Gays enjoy all the same rights as every fall apart American , but in that respect is no right to founder a conjugal union recognise by the distinguish . This is an important distinction gay rights would apply is gays were deprived of each of their inbuilt rights , but marriage is not a innate rightBecause of this inequality , it is intellectually dish mavinst to draw an analogy amongst the gay marriage issue and the civil rights movement of the 1950 s and 1960 s or the women s voter turnout movement . In those cases American citizens were demanding information for their constitutional rights . uniting is not a constitutional rightThat macrocosm said , in that respect is no obligate argument to ke ep on gay sight from marrying . The severalize does brook an interest in promoting marriage which is why wed couples receive tax incentives . marriage is promoted because married couples foreman to a greater extent accountable and stable homes than non-married couples . Also , marriage is recognized as the trump out atmosphere in which to raise childrenMany present that the point of marriage is to have children and that since gays can not have children of their own , they should not swallow married . This argument fails , in time , because there is no fertility test of heterosexual married couples the state recognizes the marriages of couples who are too old to have childrenA normal reign for administration should be that the government should not scrap whizz way or another unless there is a reach need for such action There is no compelling argument to be made for the government to set up marriage in this way , other than to ensure that a person can only be ma rried to unitary other person at a time and! that duette partners must be adults . After those conditions are met , the state should , rather frankly , mind its own business (2 )Hillary s Baby BondIt is goofy to argue that this proposal by Mrs . Clinton would involve spending well-nigh as ircreditworthy as the spending on the foment That being said , this is an unsustainable proposal . The majority of spending by the federal government goes to entitlement platforms especially Social Security and Medicare / Medicaid . The last of these programs is commendable they aim to guarantee a basic fringy of security to all Americans , regardless of their heartThere is a fundamental disjunction , however , in how liberals such as Hillary Clinton view the mental representation role of government . Her proposal on the baby bond certificate means that she believes one of two things . Either the government s trick is to spread wealth from the rich to the poor , or the government is more responsible with peoples m oney than the people themselves , or two of the aboveThis is clear a redistribution scheme , since if all households had the 5000 already , the program would be unnecessary . More troubling however , it implies , hardly as Social Security does , that the government is more responsible than the people . There is no such thing as...If you compulsion to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper